GB.341/INS/14/Decisions
Decisions on the reports of the Officers of the Governing Body concerning representations made under article 24 of the ILO Constitution
(Private sitting of the Governing Body)
1. Follow-up to the representation alleging non-observance by Chile of the Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 2006 (No. 187)
Noting that the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations (CEACR) had welcomed the information communicated by the Government as well as the measures taken to give effect to the recommendations made in the context of the representation presented by the College of Teachers of Chile AG, and trusting that the Government would continue to provide the information requested by the CEACR on the application of the Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 2006 (No. 187) in the context of the regular reporting cycle, the Governing Body, on the recommendation of its Officers, decided: (a) that the establishment of a tripartite committee was not necessary; and (b) to close the representation procedure.
(GB.341/INS/14/1, paragraph 9)
2. Representation alleging non-observance by Ecuador of the Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.341/INS/14/2, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.341/INS/14/2, paragraph 5)
3. Representation alleging non-observance by Uruguay of the Protection of Wages Convention, 1949 (No. 95), and the Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952 (No. 102)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.341/INS/14/3, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.341/INS/14/3, paragraph 5)
4. Representation alleging non-observance by Chile of the Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.341/INS/14/4, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.341/INS/14/4, paragraph 5)
5. Representation alleging non-observance by Poland of the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98) and the Collective Bargaining Convention, 1981 (No. 154)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.341/INS/14/5, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable with regard to Conventions Nos 87 and 98 and, as it relates to Conventions dealing with trade union rights, to refer it to the Committee on Freedom of Association for examination in accordance with articles 24 and 25 of the Constitution of the ILO.
(GB.341/INS/14/5, paragraph 5)
6. Representation alleging non-observance by Guinea of the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), the Protection of Wages Convention, 1949 (No. 95) and the Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 2006 (No. 187)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.341/INS/14/6, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.341/INS/14/6, paragraph 5)
7. Representation alleging non-observance by Peru of the Hours of Work (Industry) Convention, 1919 (No. 1)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.341/INS/14/7, and taking into consideration the recommendations of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and that it would be examined by the tripartite committee set up to examine the representation alleging non-observance by Peru of Convention No. 1 declared receivable in November 2020.
(GB.341/INS/14/7, paragraph 6)
Noting that the Committee of Experts on the Application of Conventions and Recommendations (CEACR) had welcomed the information communicated by the Government as well as the measures taken to give effect to the recommendations made in the context of the representation presented by the College of Teachers of Chile AG, and trusting that the Government would continue to provide the information requested by the CEACR on the application of the Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 2006 (No. 187) in the context of the regular reporting cycle, the Governing Body, on the recommendation of its Officers, decided: (a) that the establishment of a tripartite committee was not necessary; and (b) to close the representation procedure.
(GB.341/INS/14/1, paragraph 9)
2. Representation alleging non-observance by Ecuador of the Indigenous and Tribal Peoples Convention, 1989 (No. 169)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.341/INS/14/2, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.341/INS/14/2, paragraph 5)
3. Representation alleging non-observance by Uruguay of the Protection of Wages Convention, 1949 (No. 95), and the Social Security (Minimum Standards) Convention, 1952 (No. 102)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.341/INS/14/3, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.341/INS/14/3, paragraph 5)
4. Representation alleging non-observance by Chile of the Discrimination (Employment and Occupation) Convention, 1958 (No. 111)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.341/INS/14/4, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.341/INS/14/4, paragraph 5)
5. Representation alleging non-observance by Poland of the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87), the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98) and the Collective Bargaining Convention, 1981 (No. 154)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.341/INS/14/5, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable with regard to Conventions Nos 87 and 98 and, as it relates to Conventions dealing with trade union rights, to refer it to the Committee on Freedom of Association for examination in accordance with articles 24 and 25 of the Constitution of the ILO.
(GB.341/INS/14/5, paragraph 5)
6. Representation alleging non-observance by Guinea of the Labour Inspection Convention, 1947 (No. 81), the Protection of Wages Convention, 1949 (No. 95) and the Promotional Framework for Occupational Safety and Health Convention, 2006 (No. 187)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.341/INS/14/6, and taking into consideration the recommendation of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and to set up a tripartite committee to examine it.
(GB.341/INS/14/6, paragraph 5)
7. Representation alleging non-observance by Peru of the Hours of Work (Industry) Convention, 1919 (No. 1)
In the light of the information contained in document GB.341/INS/14/7, and taking into consideration the recommendations of its Officers, the Governing Body decided that the representation was receivable and that it would be examined by the tripartite committee set up to examine the representation alleging non-observance by Peru of Convention No. 1 declared receivable in November 2020.
(GB.341/INS/14/7, paragraph 6)